| Week
131: |
Changing
Your Relationship to Time |
| |
|
As I mentioned in last week’s experiment, recently I was faced
with a mountain of deadlines right before heading into an exceptionally
busy month. I found myself stressing out about it, and worrying that
I would never be able to get everything done. That’s when I went
to the workshop where we explored how “outcome follows purpose.” At
that workshop, the leader worked with me on the idea of clearly defining
the outcomes I needed, to set them solidly as intentions, and then to
let them go. As I mentioned last week, letting them go meant not to
spend time worrying about them, but rather to hand them over to synchronicity
and flow, and to allow myself simply to move through my activities with
my intentions in mind.
I must say that the results were quite amazing. During one day off,
where I had the space to just do what needed to be done, I set the intentions
and then didn’t bother with the clock that day. I was amazed to
notice that by the end of the day I had accomplished everything that
was at the top of the list of things that absolutely *had* to be done.
I’ve continued to experiment with how outcome follows purpose,
and have discovered that the process has to do with my fundamental relationship
with time. Rather than falling into what I’ve come to experience
as the “tyranny of time”, I’ve dropped into a more “timeless” flow
where I’m practicing setting intentions, handing them over, and
then seeing what happens. It requires me to stop myself from the habit
of saying to myself that I’m running out of time, or that I don’t
have enough time, and returning consistently to my intention to understand
timelessness and handing it over. Then, I just go about my business
without constantly checking the time.
And so, for this week’s part of the experiment about how outcome
follows purpose, I invite you to experiment with your relationship
to time, or rather timelessness. Rather than experiencing the usual
crunch of linear, time-related chores or deadlines, this week’s
experiment plays directly with a sense of timelessness, with flow.
Remember, time is a construct, and it’s also a highly-charged
emotional trigger for lots of people. I may have mentioned in an
earlier experiment a phrase a colleague told me. She talked about “time
poverty”, a condition lots of people suffer these days, in
that more of us seem to be working harder, with less time for leisure
and more concern about deadlines. This experiment is an antidote
to this kind of “time poverty”.
In order to play with this experiment, allow yourself to do the following
and notice what happens. Rather than engaging in any kind of actual “effort” here,
give yourself permission to engage this week’s experiment lightly,
with a sense of adventure. As you begin your day, notice what relationship
you’d like to have with time. Would you like to play with timelessness,
or would you like to engage time in another way – perhaps you
want to explore how it feels to move through an hour of time in a
particular way? Or, perhaps you’d like to play with what’s
called “time distortion”, where five minutes can become
the experience of 20 minutes. Milton Erickson, a psychiatrist who
taught hypnosis, used to say that time distortion happens to us all
the time. He said, for example, that if you’re sitting on a
hot stove, five seconds feels like a very long time, and if you’re
sitting in an inspiring lecture where you want to hear more, an hour
can feel like just a few minutes.
One of the side benefits of doing this kind of experiment is that
it exercises the muscle of internal awareness to those small urges
that move us in the right direction. The more responsive we can become
to these internal signals, the more we can live outcomes that follow
purposes intended to support our deepest well-being. How many times
have we all overridden this “small, still voice” in the
past and lived to regret that we didn’t listen to ourselves?
And so, please enjoy this experiment and engage it with a sense of
play. Remember that animals in nature learn what they need for survival
through play, and the quality of play with this kind of experiment
tends to allow us to be more open and curious, rather than serious
and locked in to the demand for a particular outcome.
|